Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 1 và Task 2 band 7 ngày 03/03/2022

Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 1 ngày 03/03/2022

The chart shows the percentage of people who accessed news from 4 sources from 1995 and projection to 2025

Dàn bài chi tiết

Bài mẫu tham khảo

The chart illustrates the proportion of people using different methods to access news from 1995 and the prediction to 2025.

Overall, while the internet gained more popularity during the given period, the opposite was true for the remaining figures. These trends are likely to continue in the future.

The percentage of people who watched news programs on TV was nearly 70% in 1995. The figure then decreased gradually to 55% in 2020, despite a slight rise of 3% in 2010. It is then likely to finish at exactly 50% in 2025. Additionally, starting at about 55%, the figures for newspapers and radios experienced similar downward trends, declining to about 30% in 2020. The expectation is that approximately 30% of people will use newspapers, and roughly 23% will listen to the radio to get news.

Despite only becoming available in 1995 and attracting only a small proportion of people in 2000, the internet quickly became prevalent in the next 20 years, with 40% of people using it. The figure is predicted to increase to about 55% in 2025, overcoming newspapers to become the most common method to access news in 2025.

Các cấu trúc có thể sử dụng để diễn đạt các số liệu trong bài trong thời gian quá khứ

• The percentage of people who watched news programs on TV was nearly 70% in 1995.

• The figures for newspapers and radios experienced similar downward trends, declining to about 30% in 2020

• The internet quickly became prevalent in the next 20 years, with 40% of people using it. 

Các cấu trúc có thể sử dụng để diễn đạt các số liệu trong bài trong thời gian tương lai

• The expectation is that approximately 30% of people will use newspapers, and roughly 23% will listen to the radio to get news.

• The figure is likely to increase to about 55% in 2025.

Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 ngày 03/03/2022

Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems. Others think that there are more important issues. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Các đề bài liên quan

• Research into medical treatments are essential to improve health and fight disease. Who do you think should fund this research: individuals, private companies or governments?

•  "Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Some people say that the government should give priority to health care whereas others say they should spend on other important priorities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Phân tích đề

Phạm vi chủ đề: Nghiên cứu khoa học, giải quyết các vấn đề sức khỏe, các vấn đề khác

Nhiệm vụ: Bàn luận về cả 2 phía và đưa ra ý kiến

• Giải thích tại sao nghiên cứu khoa học để giải quyết các vấn đề sức khỏe quan trọng

• Giải thích tại có những vấn đề khác cũng cần khoa học nghiên cứu

• So sánh sự quan trọng của cả hai 

Định nghĩa các khái niệm có trong đề:

• scientific research: nghiên cứu khoa học

• focus on: tập trung vào 

• solve world health problems: giải quyết các vấn đề về sức khỏe trên thế giới 

Dàn bài chi tiết

Các ý tưởng khác có thể sử dụng

Bài mẫu tham khảo

Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems. Others think that there are more important issues. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

While some people believe that science should place emphasis on addressing health issues, opponents suggest that other problems should be prioritized. As I believe the prime mission of research is to enhance human welfare, studying other issues besides health challenges can also contribute to this.

On the one hand, it is reasonable for science to attach importance to dealing with health concerns because they are closely related to human lives. If scientists could dedicate more time and effort to studying treatments for many fatal diseases, such as cancer, they could be entirely treated or prevented, and billions of people’s lives could be saved. An example of this is the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, in which millions of people lost their lives, and the number could have been even larger if research for COVID vaccines and treatments had not been the top priority of many governments. 

However, other areas such as environmental and economic issues should not be neglected because they are, in many ways, determinants of health issues as well. Regarding the environment, if humans had carried out more research to find solutions to pollution, loss of biodiversity, or deforestation, many people's health or even lives could have not been at risk. There are also economic problems like poverty or inflation that affect many aspects of well-being, including poor living conditions, healthcare accessibility, and resources for health promotion. Hence, if poverty can be tackled by intensive study, it may be a preemptive measure to ensure public health. Thus, resolving threats to wellness requires a combination of research in different fields.

All things considered, although health research can help save lives, there may be issues in other areas that warrant scientific attention, like environmental and economic ones, as they can also have an influence on human flourishing. 

Vocabulary

1. place (great) emphasis on/ put (great) emphasis on: đặt trọng tâm vào 

2. human welfare: phúc lợi con người 

3. dedicate time and effort to something: dành nhiều thời gian và nỗ lực hơn cho cái gì đó

4. fatal diseases: những bệnh hiểm nghèo 

5. top priority: ưu tiên hàng đầu 

6. Determinant (n): yếu tố quyết định 

7. poor living conditions: điều kiện sống kém, tệ hại 

8. a preemptive measure: một biện pháp phủ đầu

9. carry out research: thực hiện nghiên cứu 

10. loss of biodiversity: sự mất đa dạng sinh học 

Xem thêm: Bài mẫu IELTS Writing 2022 kèm bài mẫu