mọi người chữa bài giúp em với ạ!!! Sắp thi rồi em lo quá
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a growing belief that no-payment community services should be made mandatory in high school projects. Despite public concerns centering on such practice, I am among the advocates of this school of thought for various reasons.
To commence, should participation in unpaid community service be incorporated into the core high school education, students' various qualities may be developed and polished. To clarify, by helping the society via multiple jobs such as neighborhood renovation, charitable work...., learners may obtain practical knowledge of the outside world beyond the confines of their home and acquire numerous transferable skills namely communication, teamwork, leadership... to name but a few. To exemplify, voluntary youth education facilitates participants' communicative skills and patience, both of which are valuable assets coveted by many. Additionally, students can gain insights into their potential areas of expertise with community service being part of their syllabus. Through experimenting and engaging in a range of tasks, pupils are bound to pinpoint their passions and find their calling. As a result, they have a clearer view of career paths that genuinely align with their work ethics, lifestyles and beliefs, giving them a competitive advantage careerwise in the job market.
To reiterate, from my perspective, it is indubitably evident that high schoolers will greatly benefit from unpaid community service being a mandatory subject in their curricula as it will effectively enhance their skill acquisition and development along with career-related advantages..